The Father’s Day Mafia Hit A true life crime story by Andrew Brel
“Probably the most important book on British family law ever written.” Dr. Richard Niles
This is a true life crime story. In ordinary language crime is an unlawful act punishable by a state. There are two avenues for this story to explore. Interpreting the essence of what is crime. One is the crime itself. The criminal act. The second is the states punishment.
When a crime is not punishable by the state is it still a crime? There are many examples to choose from in this regard.
Slavery was not a crime for hundreds of years in British law. Those who opposed slavery by protesting were punished by the state. They were the criminals. And yet in any ethical examination of crime slave trading is wrong. And should be criminal. Even when the law says it is not. What about those 300 years when the law got it wrong? In all good crime thrillers, the devil is in the detail. In this story we examine the crime of child-abuse. Ethically and legally.
When is child abuse an offense? When the state punishes child abusers or when child abuse occurs.
The forensic detail of larceny in The Father’s Day Mafia Hit is made plain in the judges own hand. Obstructing the course of justice and abusing a child is examined by way of confession, written into her judgment in her own words. Words that exist in stark contrast to factual evidence. Binary black and white true-or-false evidence that shows, beyond all reasonable doubt the lie in each judgment-point where the judge has lied.
In so far as a crime thrillers go, how this larceny was constructed on the twin pillars of deceit and perjury, in which child-abuse and the obstruction of justice is always no more than acceptable collateral damage by the family court service, the judgment is a doozy.
In the judgment we see multiple binary facts where the judgment and the evidence exist at opposing ends of the truth spectrum.
For example: The judge rules a building is not flooded. But the building is flooded. The judge rules the valuation of the building based on her finding that it is not flooded and makes a financial award based on this incorrect valuation. There are costs consequences for this deliberate obstruction of justice. Yet, because the judgment says it the buildings is not flooded then it is not flooded. In law at least. In actuality it is flooded because flood water abounds.
Despite multiple obvious flaws, the judgment proceeds and is made un-appealable. The judge enjoys qualified immunity despite the clear evidence of malicious prejudice including witness tampering.
The law does not apply equally to lawmakers. In this hearing a judge has lied knowing the law provides a lifelong immunity from prosecution for the same criminal offenses any citizen would have faced directly after these offenses were committed. In this case, April 2015.
There is no law more contemptible than that which serves to protect child-abusers from being made accountable. Reform in British family law will start with removing qualified immunity from judges who are able to interfere with the course of justice, willfully encourage perjury in enabling larceny, while enjoying lifelong immunity for the child-abusive consequences of their family-court judgments. Do lies matter. Do lies have consequences. Does child-abuse matter when a multi-billion pound per annum business would be compromised by it’s abolition in family court?
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.